Claims scrubbing engine MVP: rules engine first or payer workflows first?
Teams building denial-prevention tools have to choose between broad generic validation and deeper payer-specific value early on.
Points worth discussing:
• Generic completeness and coding checks create fast MVP coverage
• Payer rules drive differentiation but increase maintenance complexity
• Feedback quality matters as much as rule count
If you were building the first version, where would you focus for the best market signal?
